Legal Opinion

Zuehls v. Zuehls

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.

As heretofore appears, the judgment of divorce made two distinct awards to plaintiff aside from providing for a dissolution of the marital status. Defendant was ordered to pay plaintiff $500, the value of a ring belonging to her and converted by him. He was also ordered to *475pay the sum of $247 temporary alimony in arrears, together with attorney’s fees and costs. Since the judgment appealed from permitted plaintiff to purge the contempt by payment of back alimony and costs, the provisions in the judgment with reference to payment by defendant to plaintiff of the value of the ring are not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lally v. LallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Park v. . ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Staples v. StaplesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Weber v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kempster v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Schroeder v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Schroeder v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API