Legal Opinion

Closterman v. Lubin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1933No. 7408PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henna, Judge:

On the 14th day of March, 1930, the plaintiff, C. H. Closter-man, and the defendants, B. J. Lubin, Martha Lubin, J. Lubin and Clara Lubin, were stockholders in Dickinson Furniture Company, a corporation doing an extensive retail furniture business in the City of Huntington. Out of a total of 840 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, J. Lubin held 86, B. J. Lubin 742, Clara Lubin 5 and the plaintiff, C. H. Closterman, 2 shares. Both plaintiff and the defendants were also owners of the Class A or Class B of the preferred stock of the company, neither of which had voting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lipscomb's Adm'r v. CondonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Adams v. Virginian Gasoline & Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Moore Lumber Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Eaves v. VialSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Evans v. KirsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Puffer v. Hub Cigar Store, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. MichaelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. CruikshankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API