Legal Opinion

Trussell v. Bear Manufacturing Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 9, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a tort action. The plaintiff Trussell purchased second-hand a wheel balancer manufactured by the defendant Bear. The original purchase was made from Bedford Auto Supply, a jobber distributing and providing some servicing of Bear’s equipment. While utilizing this wheel balancer in his business in Winchester, Tennessee, plaintiff was injured when the balancer separated from a motor vehicle wheel which he was undertaking to balance with the mechanism, and struck his leg. This action followed.

Substituted service of process was had on the defendant Bear through the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978
  2. Shires v. Magnavox Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
  3. Fayette v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1967
  4. Steelman v. StricklandDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
  5. Cannon v. MetcalfeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API