Legal Opinion

Watson v. Kerr

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 23, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

Plaintiff who is a taxpayer of Phelps County and also the holder of a warrant drawn oh the contingent fund of said county seeks by this action to have the payment of certain other warrants drawn prior to his against said fund enjoined and those warrants canceled . The defendant Kerr is the Treasurer of Phelps County; the other defendants are the holders of the warrants which it is sought to have canceled.

The facts as gathered from the evidence and the admissions made by the pleadings may be succinctly stated as follows:

On the 16th day of March, 1922, the County Court of Phelps County entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Decker v. DiemerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Clark County v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. State ex rel. National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sterling v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Clarence Special School District v. School District No. 67Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Watson v. KerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  4. Judd v. Consolidated School District No. 3 of Platte CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API