Legal Opinion

Halloran v. Town of North Canaan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 24, 1993No. 11695PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The plaintiffs, Michael Halloran and George Jones, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their request for a declaratory judgment. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) the town voted to purchase and negotiated a price to purchase the property prior to initiating condemnation proceedings, (2) the taking was not void because the town had voted to purchase and to negotiate a price for the property, and (3) the town had authorized the town attorney to negotiate the price of the easement. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  3. Town of West Hartford v. TalcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Trinity College v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  5. State v. ArbourConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Maluszewski v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Statewide Grievance Committee v. SpirerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API