Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Scott v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1989No. 85-206, 86-423Published

1ConcurrenceSchwelb, Associate Judge

This is, I think, a melancholy case for the judges of this court who must participate in it. It comes before us as a criminal appeal from a felony conviction, but the issue which we must decide en banc has only an incidental connection with Scott. Rather, eight judges, most or all of whom know Judge Murphy well, are required to grit their teeth1 and pass on allegations that he transgressed ethical proscriptions in violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. This duty is particularly unpleasant in this era of Operation Greylord and similar examples of judicial corruption, for we are not dealing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API