Fayard v. Celestan

Appellant’s memorandum opposing dismissal apprehends first, that dismissal means the end of all hope for righting alleged wrong; and second, that appellant’s poverty and consequent inability to post a suspensive appeal bond deny her meaningful access to the courts in contravention of La.Const. art. 1 § 6. I believe these concerns justify additional response.

First, the present appeal is not from a final judgment which would end the litigation, but only from an interlocutory judgment. Even if the property were not yet sold and we decided preliminary injunction should issue, that would not have…