Legal Opinion

Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Mahoney

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

A hearing was had before the court for the purpose of determining whether respondent Mahoney, as administratrix, could establish the uninsured status of a motor vehicle allegedly responsible for decedent’s injuries and death. Petitioner MVAIC contends that there is no sufficient evidence of that status, and that as a result Mahoney may not proceed to arbitration against it.

The driver-owner of the supposedly uninsured vehicle, Grant, cannot be located despite the extensive efforts of the parties. California, the State of Grant’s licensing and registration, keeps no record of automobile…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ross v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & MoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Foster & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Olenick v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. American Security Insurance v. Ojomu-KayoesNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API