Legal Opinion
Kleeberg v. Sipser
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The action is for libel and the complaint was dismissed upon the ground that it states no cause of action. Only a question of sufficiency of pleading is presented by this appeal.
Five alleged causes of action are set forth and they aver the following to be facts: Plaintiff is an attorney admitted to practice in this State and was retained by Louis Orlik, residing in London, to represent him here in certain business negotiations with his brother Alfred Orlik, a resident of New York. Defendant’s interest, if any, in these negotiations does not appear from the complaint. During their pendency,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanderson v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Sydney v. MacFadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Ben-Oliel v. Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- McNamara v. . GoldanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Nichols v. Item Publishers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- November v. Time Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Julian v. American Business Consultants, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Gurtler v. Union Parts Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.