Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1910No. 372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The record is without a statement of facts, bill of exception, motion for new trial, or motion to quash, or in arrest of judgment. There is filed in this court an original paper attacking the information for its alleged insufficiency to charge the offense of libel. If the information fails to charge that offense as required by the statute we would reverse and dismiss the prosecution, although not attacked in the trial court. This question is not a novel one. It is not here meant to hold that for all inaccuracies in the indictment this court would reverse and dismiss.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Perez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Pospishel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API