Legal Opinion
Gallo v. Eaton Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 16, 2000No. 3:93-r-00044PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COVELLO, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Albert Gallo, has brought this action for damages and injunctive relief against the defendant, Eaton Corporation (“Eaton”) pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et. seq., and common law tenets concerning breach of contract, defamation, and wrongful discharge/demotion in violation of public policy. Eaton brings the within motion pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that there are no genuine issues of material fact, and that it is entitled…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lajeunesse v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001