Legal Opinion

Hitt v. Allen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1852PublishedCited by 19 opinions

This cause was heard before Henderson, Judge, and a jury, at the December term, 1850, of the Winnebago Circuit Court, on a change of venue from the county of Ogle, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the appellee. Hitt, one of the defendants below, brought the cause to this court by appeal. The pleadings and facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTrumbull, J.

This was an action of debt, commenced in 1847, in the Ogle Circuit Court, by Allen against Hitt and Swingley, to recover for services rendered by him as a schoolteacher, in the years 1838, 1839.

The declaration contained the common counts for work and labor, materials furnished, money lent, &c.

Both defendants were served with process. Hitt alone pleaded to the action, and judgment, by default, was entered against Swingley.

Subsequently, in pursuance of an agreement between Allen and Hitt, the venue was changed to the county of Winnebago, where a trial was had and judgment rendered against both…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brennan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Whittemore v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Geohegan v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hamilton v. American Gage & MacHine Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Swift & Co. v. DollahanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API