Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campbell v. Booth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1975No. 18592Published

1DissentAkin, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The trial judge ruled correctly in instructing a verdict for the defendants for the following reasons: (1) plaintiffs neither pled nor proved the proper measure of damages in a suit for alleged fraud under Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. § 27.01 (Vernon 1968); (2) there is no evidence of probative value on the vital issue of alleged “fraudulent concealment” under the doctrine of Joske v. Irvine, 91 Tex. 574, 44 S.W. 1059 (1898).

1. Damages

Plaintiffs’ trial amendment included the following pertinent pleading: “That subsequent to obtaining possession of the house Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State v. CarpenterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API