Legal Opinion

Parramore v. Taylor

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided January 16, 1901No. 1,014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

Final hearing on bill and answer-raising questions of validity and infringement of the first and second claims of complainant’s patent, No. 629,391, granted July 25, 1899, to Keddin W. Parramore, for a hose supporter. One of the objects, of the invention, as stated by the patentee, “is to provide an improved construction especially designed to he connected with a stud or clasp of the corset, thus dispensing with the use of safety pins and other, *966attaching devices, which have been found injurious to the corset, and enabling a tight-fitting skirt to be clasped around…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. WolfeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
  2. Parramore v. SteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API