Legal Opinion

In Re Millspaugh

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 12, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

Habeas Corpus:' Upon application our writ was awarded, and return thereto was duly made, and the cause heard in February, 1925, and submitted for opinion. The statement of the Attorney-General fairly states the case. Mr. Millspaugh was evidently desir ous of having this court construe a .statute, and raises no question as to the fact that his evidence, and his books and records, might not prove valuable to the defendant, as indorser, upon a note in suit. The statement of the Attorney-General is as follows-:

“In this case there is no dispute or controversy as to the facts, he.nce not necessary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reyburn v. HandlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  2. Cherry Grove Savings & Loan Co. v. Ohio Deposit Guarantee FundClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API