In Re Millspaugh
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.
Habeas Corpus:' Upon application our writ was awarded, and return thereto was duly made, and the cause heard in February, 1925, and submitted for opinion. The statement of the Attorney-General fairly states the case. Mr. Millspaugh was evidently desir ous of having this court construe a .statute, and raises no question as to the fact that his evidence, and his books and records, might not prove valuable to the defendant, as indorser, upon a note in suit. The statement of the Attorney-General is as follows-:
“In this case there is no dispute or controversy as to the facts, he.nce not necessary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reyburn v. HandlanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Cherry Grove Savings & Loan Co. v. Ohio Deposit Guarantee FundClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1986