Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Chapin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an action of book account, appealed from a justice of the peace, in which there was a judgment to account, in the county court, and a reference to an auditor.

Read the full summary

This was an action of book account, appealed from a justice of the peace, in which there was a judgment to account, in the county court, and a reference to an auditor. The auditor reported that the parties having appeared before him, — “ The plaintiff exhibited his account against the defendant, of which the following is a copy : 1837. Ziba Chapin to Abiel Stoddard, Dr. To 1 days’ work, by Rufus Cobb, 84 May or June, cash delivered wife, 5.00 Oct., 1838, overpaid on note, 50 Cr. By cash to balance days’ work, ■ $ 6.34 84 5.50 " On the hearing of the case, the auditor reports, that the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Ch. J.

The only subject of dispute in this action is, whether the county court was correct in rendering judgment for the plaintiff to recover the two charges, one of five dollars as cash delivered the wife of the defendant, and the other of fifty cents for money overpaid on note. If the county court were incorrect in allowing these charges, judgment should have been for the defendant, and this would have carried the cost, which has increased to a large amount.

On reports of auditors, the county court are only to decide questions of law'arising…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Brainerd v. Champlain Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1857
  3. Bishop v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
  4. Turner Falls Lumber Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  5. Locke v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API