Anders v. California State University, Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CASE: 1:21-cv-179-AWI-BAM 8 TAYLOR ANDERS, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 9 Plaintiffs, RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND, IN THE 10 v. ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 11 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO, et al. 12 Defendants. (Doc. No. 94) 13 14 15 Plaintiffs bring a renewed motion for class certification and in the alternative, motion for 16 reconsideration. Doc. No. 94-1. The motion has been fully briefed and deemed suitable for 17 decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.