Legal Opinion

New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 9, 1917No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In'Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Action by the United 'States against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff (232 Fed. 179), and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, Circuit Judge.

This action whs brought to recover five penalties, of $1,000 each, under the immigration laws, for assisting and inducing five aliens to enter the United States from Canada to work as laborers on the defendant’s railroad. The aliens in question did not enter the United States but it is asserted by the defendant in error that there was a violation of the statute by the railroad company’s agents in encouraging and assisting the aliens to enter, although they never did enter the United States. The court rendered judgment for one penalty only, of $1,000. .

[1] The act of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. John R. Thompson Co., Inc. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. International Silver Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1919
  3. United States v. MorriseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. United States v. River Spinning Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API