Cummings v. Strobridge Land Syndicate, Pac. Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John S. Chapman, Johnston & Jones, Stanton L. Carter, Platt & Bayne, and H. H. Welsh, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage alleged to have been given by the defendant Sayle to plaintiff on the fifteenth day of November, 1881, to secure the payment of a promissory note made by Sayle at the same date. The amount of the promissory note was two thousand dollars. A trial was had, resulting in judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $16,480.50, and for a decree of the sale of the mortgaged premises. The motion for a new trial was denied, and certain of the defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion. The salient facts of the case are these: Sayle,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hadley v. ChapinNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Tracy v. GaudinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930