Estate of Gutman v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
TURNER, Judge:
Taking the position that at all times material from the formation of the new partnership through 1944, Gutman and Goldberg were in the business of buying and selling real estate, mortgages and interests in mortgages and that at all times during which they were the owners of interests in the Harrison Avenue and Crotona Avenue mortgages they held such interests primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of their real estate and mortgage business, the petitioners contend that the respondent erred in disallowing the deductions taken as losses on account of such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boissevain v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Hale v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Cluett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Koehn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pachella v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Kent v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Frick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- W. L. Schautz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Edmonds v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.