Jefferson County v. Weissman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceShaw, Justice
I agree with much of the discussion in the main opinion, and I concur that the trial court’s judgment is due to be affirmed. I write to make several observations.
I. Conflict Between § 106 and § 122
There is no facial conflict between Ala. Const. 1901, Art. IV, § 106, and Art. V, § 122. The possible conflict alleged by Jefferson County (“the County”) is “latent”; it does not exist on the face of the two sections, but, instead, arises upon consideration of certain hypothetical scenarios. Specifically, the County notes that § 122 is designed to allow for the governor to call a special session to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State ex rel. Covington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Ctr. Auth. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Byrd v. State Ex Rel. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Fowler v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.