Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jefferson County v. Weissman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 16, 2011No. 1100293Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Justice

I agree with much of the discussion in the main opinion, and I concur that the trial court’s judgment is due to be affirmed. I write to make several observations.

I. Conflict Between § 106 and § 122

There is no facial conflict between Ala. Const. 1901, Art. IV, § 106, and Art. V, § 122. The possible conflict alleged by Jefferson County (“the County”) is “latent”; it does not exist on the face of the two sections, but, instead, arises upon consideration of certain hypothetical scenarios. Specifically, the County notes that § 122 is designed to allow for the governor to call a special session to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State ex rel. Covington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Ctr. Auth. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Byrd v. State Ex Rel. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. Fowler v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API