State v. . Freeman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Statement of the ease on appeal — Practice. INDICTMENT tried before MacRae, Judge, and'a jury, at .Spring Term, 1885, of the Superior Court of Robeson county. There was a verdict of guilty, and from the judgment thereon, the defendant appealed. On the hearing in the Supreme Court, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment, on the ground that no statement of the case accompanied the record.
1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.
The defendant was charged with selling intoxicating liquor on Sunday. He was found guilty by the jury and ¡sentenced by the Court, from which he appealed to this Court.
There is no “statement of the case” accompanying the record sent to this Court, and when that is the case and no error appears in the record in a criminal action, the Court will affirm the judgment of the Court below. State v. Murray, 80 N. C., 364; State v. Edney, Ibid., 360, and State v. Leiteh, 82 N. C., 539.
We find no error in the record: The judgment of the Superior Court of Robeson is therefore affirmed. Let this be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- State v. . LeitchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCoy v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State v. . BaggySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- McCoy v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State v. . FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- State v. BagbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.