State v. Menz
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.
1Per curiam
Instruction No. 8 informed the jury that the finding of a United States revenue stamp in a place used for the manufacture or storage of intoxicating liquors showing payment by any person of the special tax for a period not then expired is prima facie *198evidence that such person maintains a nuisance there. The appellant insists that this was error because instruction No. 9 told the jury that “Exhibit D,” introduced in evidence for the purpose of showing that the appellant had paid the internal-revenue tax, was withdrawn by the state and was not to be considered by them for any purpose. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- State v. LaboreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- State v. BursawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. ForlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952