Legal Opinion

State v. Menz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1909No. 16,408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Per curiam

Instruction No. 8 informed the jury that the finding of a United States revenue stamp in a place used for the manufacture or storage of intoxicating liquors showing payment by any person of the special tax for a period not then expired is prima facie *198evidence that such person maintains a nuisance there. The appellant insists that this was error because instruction No. 9 told the jury that “Exhibit D,” introduced in evidence for the purpose of showing that the appellant had paid the internal-revenue tax, was withdrawn by the state and was not to be considered by them for any purpose. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. State v. LaboreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. State v. BursawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. State v. ForlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Northcrest, Inc. v. WALKER BANK & TRUST CO.Utah Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API