Legal Opinion

Rich-Garrison Motor Co. v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1931No. 20919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where an automobile dealer, under an agreement with a person owning an automobile, takes the automobile and sells it, and issues to the owner a paper denominated a “credit memorandum,” which *835contains, so far as it represents the agreement between the parties, a description of the automobile, and recites that a certain amount of money is a “credit to apply on new car or new truck,” and that “this credit is transferable,” the credit memorandum is on its face incomplete as a contract and does not clearly and without ambiguity show whether the credit memorandum should be accepted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Champion v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Ocean Steamship Co. v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Louisiana Red Cypress Co. v. Gilmore & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Saluda Wholesale & Warehouse Co. v. Rooney & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Beckmann.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API