Coca Cola Co. v. Duberstein
District Court, S.D. Ohio
In Equity. Bill by tlie Coca-Cola Company against Benjamin Duberstein, doing business as the Dayton Mineral Water Company, and others.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLISTER, District Judge.
[1] Beginning in 1886, complainant’s predecessors had built up a large business in a syrup In which there was an infusion of an extract of coca shrub and of cola nuts; the latter made after, it is said, the cocaine is extracted from them. The syrup is tiie basis of a nonintoxicating beverage made by combining it with carbonated water. Since 1892, the complainant has been the exclusive owner and proprietor of the business. The product was named “Coca-Cola” at the beginning, and the beverage has been known under that name for more than 30 years. By the expenditure of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nashville Syrup Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1913
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Nashville Syrup Co.District Court, D. Tennessee · 1912
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. Avery Lighting Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Old Dominion Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1929
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Nehi Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.