Legal Opinion

Claim of Ladley v. Akzo Salt, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Mercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 16, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that the payment of death benefits to claimant’s children beyond the age of 18 is the responsibility of the employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier.

Claimant died as the result of a 1990 industrial accident. Workers’ compensation death benefits of $340 per week were awarded and apportioned among claimant’s widow and his two dependent children. The case was closed and a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) decision filed February 8, 1992 established…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Spaminato v. Bay Transportation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Claim of Ronda v. Edenwald ContractingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Claim of Giglio v. Fehlhaber Horn Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Claim of Carpenter v. Jim's Delicatessen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Claim of De Pasquale v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Mace v. Owl Wire & Cable Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API