Legal Opinion

Bardeus v. Huber

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

The appellee sued the appellant, in the Lake Circuit Court, to recover possession of certain real estate in that county. ’ The venue was changed to Pulaski county. An answer of general denial was filed, and the cause was tried by the court, resulting in a general finding for the appellee. *236The appellant filed a motion for a new trial, and in his motion stated, as one of his reasons therefor, that the finding was not sustained by the evidence. The motion was overruled, and judgment was rendered on the finding for possession of the premises, in the usual form, and for costs against the appellant.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tyler v. WilkersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Piel v. BrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Banks v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Reed v. DivenIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Catlett v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hasselman v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Stotsenburg v. SameIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Nelson v. BronnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Rickcreek v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API