Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1947No. 3636PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Since “trustee process is an equitable proceeding in which the right of the parties are determined upon equitable principles” (Corning v. Records, 69 N. H. 390, 396), plaintiff maintains that the bank’s failure to make them a party after the filing of the bill of interpleader is a wrong which creates liability relying upon Protective &c. Company v. Collins, 92 N. H. 27. The contention is well founded.

The law is well settled that a trustee is not protected by a judgment against him where he failed to give notice of the pendency of the proceedings to a third person who he knew claimed an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madden Engineering Corp. v. Major Tube Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API