Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Bullitt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Butler District Court. Ejectment. Judgment for plaintiffs, at the October term, 1887. The defendant, Bergman, brings the case to this court. The material facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

The heirs of H. M. Bullitt, deceased, instituted an action in ejectment against George W. Bergman to recover possession of a part of a lot in Wichita. In an answer and cross-petition, Bergman denied the plaintiffs’ right of recovery and alleged title in himself, which he asked to have quieted. The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment was given in favor of the plaintiffs, which the defendant alleges is erroneous and should be reversed. The plaintiffs below relied on a title derived from the general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Osborne Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Williams v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kleinschmidt v. ScribnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Smith v. BraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Kindley v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Harper v. City of Conway SpringsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
  5. Morrow v. IngeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API