Legal Opinion
State v. Roten
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 2002No. Case Nos. CA99-09-102 and CA99-09-107PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Valen, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Larry Quentin Roten, appeals his conviction in the Warren County Common Pleas Court on various counts of intimidation, retaliation, and using sham legal process. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons outlined below.
{¶ 2} Charges were filed against appellant in connection with documents he presented to the Warren County Prosecuting Attorney Tim Oliver, the Warren County Clerk of Courts James Spaeth, and Paul Woodbury, the grand jury foreperson who served on a grand jury that heard earlier charges against appellant and signed the original indictments…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Clark, Ca2007-03-037 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. KinstleOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. SwiergoszOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Stone, Ca2007-11-132 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Argote-Romero v. LAZ Parking LTD., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.