In re the Arbitration between Bullard & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
The claimants herein are husband and wife. The husband owned two cars; one was insured and one was not. The husband was driving the uninsured ear with his wife by his side when it is alleged they were involved in an accident with a £ £ hit-and-run ’ ’ vehicle. The policy covering the insured car contained the usual “New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement ”.
In filing the notice of claim, the claimants originally contended that they were ‘ ‘ Qualified Persons ’ ’ and as such they come within the purview of the remedial nature of the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Levy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Levy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981