Legal Opinion

Marion Square Corp. v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 24, 1989No. 88-3835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Upon statute of frauds grounds, the district judge declined to enforce an agreement for the cancellation of a lease. She thought that the writings exchanged between the parties did not adequately fix the date upon which the cancellation of the lease was to be effective and that they did not sufficiently describe the equipment to be sold. Concluding that neither ground is tenable, we reverse and remand with instructions to award appropriate damages to the lessor.

I

Marion Square was the owner of a shopping center in West, Virginia. In the late 1970s it leased one of its stores for a twenty-year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holley's v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kennedy v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Harper v. PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jones v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lewis v. W. Va. Pulp & Paper Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marion Square Corporation v. The Kroger CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API