Legal Opinion
Heimann v. Snead
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1998No. 96-2266PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The initial issue we must decide in this appeal is jurisdictional: Whether the dismissal without prejudice of Defendants’ counterclaims renders the district court’s prior decisions disposing of Plaintiffs’ complaint on the merits final and appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291? We hold that the dismissal without prejudice of Defendants’ counterclaims does not render the prior decisions disposing of Plaintiffs’ complaint on the merits final and appealable under § 1291, and thus remand to the district court so that Plaintiffs may seek the required certification order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
I
P…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Robert Lewis v. B.F. Goodrich Company Daniel Newsome Roy AilstockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Delores J. Cook v. Rocky Mountain Bank Note Company, a Colorado Corporation, and Romo Corp., a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Tma Fund, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. James Biever and Pamela BieverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
4Cited by14 opinions
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Beugler v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Jackson v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Heimann v. SneadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Brown v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.