Enger v. Estate of Gianino
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the denial of a claim by an attorney for the reasonable value of attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand.
Carl A. Enger (hereinafter referred to as “lawyer”) brought a claim against the estate of Ruth Gianino (hereinafter referred to as “estate”) for the reasonable value of services rendered to Ruth Gianino (hereinafter referred to as “decedent”) during her lifetime. The claim was first presented to the probate court. It was denied, appealed to the circuit court and denied once more on the ground that “there was no sufficient evidence upon which the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Craig v. Jo B. Gardner, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Allmon v. AllmonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Union Electric Company v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Schanz v. Estate of TerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Malecek v. Estate of EngerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fickie v. Estate of ChrismanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982