Legal Opinion

Randell v. Fellers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1934No. 42108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The right of appellants, as administrators, whose decedent was not a party to or the owner or holder of the mortgage involved, to prosecute this action to foreclose the same is predicated upon the equitable doctrine of subrogation. The essential facts are in no sense complicated and may be briefly stated.

On or about September 3, 1919, Arda Brubaker McNulty, guardian of her minor son Burl Brubaker, was, upon proper application and showing to the court, authorized to make sale of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 22, township 74, range 15, Mahaska county, the property of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Leach v. Commercial Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Jackson Co. v. Boylston Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Allen v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Raub v. General Income Sponsors of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. American Surety Co. v. State Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. National Surety Corp. v. Edwards House Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Adams v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API