Legal Opinion

Bedford Corp. v. Price

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. 7488PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

The purpose of this proceeding in mandamus is to determine whether the city of Charleston must allow a discount of two and one-half per centum upon taxes paid before the date on which they are due. Under a provision of its charter (sec. 52, chapter 4, Acts of the Legislature of 1929, Municipal Charters), the taxes of the city are collectible semi-annually, the first half of the taxes for a given year is due on the first day of November of that year, and the second half is due the first of May, following. The charter does not provide for a discount for prompt payment.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roby v. SheppardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. FurrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Brozka v. County Court of Brooke CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Simms v. SawyersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. HaskinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Myers v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Wheeling Ex Rel. Carter v. American Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cole v. Pond Fork Oil & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Leonhart v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Prager v. W. H. Chapman & Sons Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API