Legal Opinion

Mitts v. McMorran

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1891Published

Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the former opinion, reported in 64 Mich. 664.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This case has been once before in this Court, and is found reported in 64 Mich. 664. On the former trial the defendant had verdict and judgment under direction of the court, and a new trial was ordered. The case has again been tried by a jury, and the plaintiff had verdict and judgment. The defendant *95now brings the case into this Court by writ of error. It will not be necessary to restate the facts out of which the controversy arises, as they are fully set forth in the former opinion by Mr. Justice Champlin.

The errors now relied upon by the defendant’s counsel which we deem it necessary to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitts v. McMorranMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API