Buska v. Central Life Assurance Co.

The point of controversy between plaintiff and defendant company is the extent of the latter’s obligation to pay plaintiff renewal commissions which accrued subsequent to November 30, 1964. The company contends that the schedule of renewal commissions set forth in the contract is to be reduced by three, while plaintiff maintains that there should be no such reduction because the company did not have good cause for terminating his agency contract.

Par. 11 (a) of the agency contract expressly provides that either the plaintiff or the company may terminate upon thirty days’ notice without any…