Ronsley v. City of Fort Worth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, Justice.
We previously rendered an opinion in this cause, in which we affirmed the judg*258ment of the trial court in sustaining a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In support of our conclusions, we discussed, among other things, an ordinance by the City of Fort Worth, which prohibited swimming in Lake Worth at certain places designated therein. We stated that swimming in the lake where deceased was injured was prohibited by the ordinance. That statement by us has been challenged by plaintiffs in the motion for rehearing.
The record indisputably shows that deceased was injured…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Felton v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- Felton v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1946