Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank of Lewisville v. Mayberry

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 2004No. CA 03-1135Published

1DissentSam Bird, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority herein because I disagree with its conclusion that the error that appellant sought to have corrected by the trial court in this case was not the type of clerical error that is subject to correction under Ark. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

I think it would be helpful to the reader’s understanding of my position to more clearly set forth the factual scenario from which this case arose. This appeal arises from a foreclosure action involving two parcels of land owned by appellees, Eddie and Chylene Mayberry (the Mayberrys). One of the parcels contains…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Travelers Fire Insurance Company v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API