Legal Opinion
In Re Inductors Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 3, 2022No. 5:18-cv-00198Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 IN RE INDUCTORS ANTITRUST Case No. 5:18-cv-00198-EJD LITIGATION Re: Dkt. No. 436 9 10 11 12 13 FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL Case No. 5:19-cv-00078-EJD USA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 167 14 Plaintiff, 15 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO 16 DISMISS FLEXTRONICS’ FOURTH PANASONIC CORPORATION, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 17 DEPENDABLE’S THIRD AMENDED Defendants. COMPLAINT 18 19 Plaintiff Flextronics International U.S.A., Inc. (“Flextronics”) purchases inductors to build 20 electronic products…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.