Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Stewart

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Green Lake County. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendant Stewcvrt appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The respondent brought this action against Miller and Stewart for the purpose of having a certain quitclaim. deed given by the respondent and his wife to Miller, bearing date the 17th of May, 1880, conveying to him certain lots in the city of Berlin, declared to be a mortgage, and to permit the respondent to redeem the premises from said mortgage. Stewart is made a party defendant, because, after the deed was given to Miller, and before the commencement of this action, Miller had conveyed the same lots to Stewart for a valuable consideration, by warranty deed dated on the 16th day of June,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blodgett v. HittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Mickles v. . Dillaye and OthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Green v. DixonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Voechting v. GrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Davis v. LoukWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beach v. OsborneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  2. Lynch v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Howard v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
  4. Hicklin v. MarcoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1891
  5. Parnell v. GoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API