Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 18, 1963No. Civ. No. 63-441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

Poised for decision, on plaintiff's motion to remand, is the question of whether certain rules and regulations promulgated by the Oregon State Industrial Accident Commission cast civil liability on the defendant, Costello, a foreman of the corporate defendant.

Plaintiff, while employed by Utah, was assigned by Costello to assist in the repair of a machine. Plaintiff used his own tools. In the course of the repair, the plaintiff was required to remove a bearing, and in so doing placed his metal *251punch upon the bearing. A co-worker, in the line of his duties, hit the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shelton v. ParisOregon Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolivar Sand Co., Inc. v. Allied Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
  2. Champion Brick Co. v. Signode Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API