Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Callahan

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1984PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANT, Justice.

This action arises on discretionary review from an opinion of the Court of Appeals reversing the convictions of the respondents because of what that court conceived as prejudicial error during the final argument.

During his argument, defense counsel made the following attempt to define reasonable doubt:

The other thing is the reasonable doubt. Now, since most of you have already been on a jury, you have some idea of what reasonable doubt means. The burden is on the Commonwealth to prove Mr. Callahan and Mr. Pack guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You may ask yourself exactly what…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mills v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Stopher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API