Legal Opinion
State v. Hendon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 22, 1982No. 82-285-C-2, CA A24871; No. 82-295-C-1; No. 82-303-C-2; No. 82-292-C-2; No. 82-296-C-2; No. 82-300-C-2; No. 82-279-C-3; No. 82-282-C-2; No. 82-283-C-2; No. 82-290-C-1, and 82-291-C-1; No. 82-307-C-3; No. 82-280-C-2PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendants were charged with possession of food fish unlawfully transported under the laws of another state. ORS 509.105.1 The state appeals a pre-trial order allowing defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
The state contends that the illegal “other state” transportations were violations of California Fish and Game Code § 8685.6. Defendants contend that California law does not apply to them or to any fish caught by them on the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation, no matter where the fish are subsequently possessed or transported by them, because their fishing activities are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016