Legal Opinion
Buresh v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 8, 1972No. 18840PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Defendant appeals from a decree holding that William A. Seman was a domiciliary of California and California law governs in the construction of his will; that the application of that law requires that a trust created by paragraph Second of his will be held invalid; and that the estate be distributed to plaintiff under Oregon’s intestacy statutes.
Some of the background facts for understanding of this litigation are recited in Buresh v. First National Bank, 262 Or 104, 496 P2d 913 (1972).
William A. Seman was unmarried at his death and his sole surviving issue is his daughter Lorraine M. Buresh,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Harrison v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
- Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Fletcher v. Los Angeles Trust & Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert C. Mention v. Henry Brandt GessellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Keller v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1981