Marpret Construction Corp. v. Hargust Land Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think the court had no power to cancel a Us pendens except as provided by section 123 of the Civil Practice Act, or where the complaint itself fails to state a cause of action affecting real property. Where a complaint states such a cause of action the lis pendens cannot be canceled upon proof outside of the complaint that plaintiff has no such cause of action. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Richards v. ChubaNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Billson Housing Corp. v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Estate of SabatinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
- Klunder v. HansenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Schlaifer v. Shelby-Coleridge, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.