Legal Opinion

Gulliford v. Nikko Gold Coast Cruises

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1982No. AM-208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

We reverse and remand the deputy commissioner’s order dismissing appellant and claimant Karl Gulliford’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. His claim stems from a July 13, 1980 auto accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Nikko Gold Coast Cruises, the appel-lee. The claim falls within the dual-purpose doctrine, an exception to the going and coming rule which routinely bars compensation.

Karl Gulliford worked as a tour bus dispatcher for Nikko Gold Coast Cruises, a Miami Beach tour company. In that position he was a “jack-of-all-trades,” dispatching…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. Copeland Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Cook v. Highway Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Swartzer v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. Kariger Motors, Inc. v. KARIGERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Krause v. West Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nikko Gold Coast Cruises v. GullifordSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Swartz v. McDonald's Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. The Oaks v. PaulkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API