Gulliford v. Nikko Gold Coast Cruises
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
We reverse and remand the deputy commissioner’s order dismissing appellant and claimant Karl Gulliford’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits. His claim stems from a July 13, 1980 auto accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Nikko Gold Coast Cruises, the appel-lee. The claim falls within the dual-purpose doctrine, an exception to the going and coming rule which routinely bars compensation.
Karl Gulliford worked as a tour bus dispatcher for Nikko Gold Coast Cruises, a Miami Beach tour company. In that position he was a “jack-of-all-trades,” dispatching…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. Copeland Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cook v. Highway Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Swartzer v. Food Fair Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Kariger Motors, Inc. v. KARIGERIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Krause v. West Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nikko Gold Coast Cruises v. GullifordSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Swartz v. McDonald's Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- The Oaks v. PaulkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990