Main v. Oien
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Waseca county, Buckham, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for •defendant, in an action to recover $66.45 for jewelry sold and delivered.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
Action for goods alleged to have been sold to the •defendant. The goods were ordered by the defendant in response to a circular addressed to him by the plaintiff, wherein he proposed to •send goods “to be sold on commission. * * * Patrons must prepay express charges on all goods returned. * * * All goods not returned to us at the expiration of the time which we list them to you, with express charges prepaid, toe will charge to your account, and send .you a statement. You can then remit us our share of the money.” The defendant having ordered the goods on the terms proposed, the *90same were sent…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KortgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Mosier v. WalterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Murphy v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. VeekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900