Legal Opinion

Zanes v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 13, 1967No. C.D. 2965Published

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

The above-entitled protest has been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to merchandise covered by the protest enumerated in the annexed Schedule which is incorporated herein :

1. That the merchandise represented by the items marked “A” and initialed IET by Ivan E. Taborsky on the invoices accompanying the entry covered by the protest enumerated in the attached Schedule, assessed with duty at 21% ad valorem…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Selectile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Favrot v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Favrot v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API